I have to admit to also stacking the deck with clients when I have had the opportunity, so I really admire Mary Butler’s integrity in ensuring that none of her direct clients were on her Social Media Marketing panel at #JDPAIRT… I believe this is the type of objective integrity that Shaune Raines was lamenting the lack of.

Thank you for this post. As someone we all respect in our space, I appreciate your comments and thank you for taking the time to speak with Dean and I today.

It’s unfortunate that you feel the way you do about the panel Dealer.com hosted. When you do a panel, you don’t really have much choice as to what it’s about. We were asked by JD power to cover website programs specifically. All the content on our panel was shown to JD Power and approved for the show. We had panelists from three of our clients and also a representative from Group One who is not a client.

We did in fact cover most models in place today. It seems as though you were more upset with JD Power than with Dealer.com as we discussed today on the phone…. We did cover most models in existence today with illustrations and slides showing the setups etc. Perhaps we can work together on future panels with JD Power to make sure your voice is heard.

I wanted to point out one of your comments….

“The Subaru Rep even admits that these OEM website mandates are done because “most dealers don’t know what they are doing on-line”, thus the need to provide websites to these dealers. So they are honest in saying they are catering to the lowest common denominator on their dealer body. What about the dealers who do know what they are doing on-line? I guess I give a lot more credit to dealers these days, the ones I work with are excellent at their Internet strategies.”

I believe you’re missing the point here…

First of all we have all 500+ Subaru dealerships on our program. Not the 100 mentioned. (Thank you for clarifying on ADM)

Secondly, I cannot speak for Subaru, but I believe that Subaru understands that there is a hybrid model that works well for them. The dealers that do have excellent internet departments have all of the tools at their disposal to really blow it out with their websites, but as you mentioned…this isn’t a forum for pitching products… I can personally point you to some real success stories with measureable metrics if you want to give me a call. Are there some dealers that don’t participate and don’t work on their websites?…. Sure, that happens with every program and it’s an unfortunate realty in our space. Subaru is savvy to realize that it’s about creating a strategy that increases the effectiveness of their entire brand as a whole. In fact, this year Subaru has been the only manufacturer to continue to grow sales and their websites are globally generating 2-3x the lead volume nationally than they were with their previous provider. They also recently had their first sales volume win over Mazda and VW. Subaru might be a smaller company, but they sure know what they’re doing to bring the entire brand forward and their success is undeniable.

“Subaru should Never have been the ONLY example of OEM website strategies on that panel. Mainly because Dealer.com has other OEM relationships that are NOT exclusive that would have made far better examples.”

In regards to this statement… Jason, we asked other manufacturers that we do not have exclusives with to participate and they either declined or backed out at the last minute.

“There should never have been ALL clients of the moderator’s company on that panel. That defeats the whole purpose of these panels and destroys the opportunity to give the listeners the most accurate, most intelligent, most diverse, and most comprehensive information available.”

This statement is not accurate… Yes, we had 3 of our clients on the panel, but not all. Group One is not a Dealer.com client.

All in all, our feedback from the panel was great. The dealers engaged in some real conversations about what models work best from them. DeLu from Subaru did a great job taking some heat form the guys on the panel and made some incredible points himself that the dealers up.

I disagree that dealers were not given the proper information… They were exposed to four large dealer groups that have had exposure to every program under the sun and they gave their non-biased opinion on all of them. The point of the whole conversation was to point out that although some strides have been made to bridge the gap between dealers and OEMs when it comes to website programs, there is still a long way to go.

I think only by working together and keeping the conversations respectful and progressive can we find our way to a solution. There has to be a solution that both dealers and manufacturers can agree on. Until that time, both our companies should continue to work towards that goal together productively in the same space.

I agree…. Sales pitches leave a bad taste in anyone’s mouth at these shows, but our panel was not a sales pitch. JD Power is primarily a Tier 1-2 event and getting OEMs talking about programs is a good thing for every vendor in our space.

Thanks again for your comments and we look forward to working with you as we discussed.
Mike

Aside from completely ignoring the creditability and class that this event has been built on over the years (I have spoken or been on a panel every year), my problem with the panel moderated and dominated by Dealer.com and it’s clients…is that much of the information was very incomplete and did NOT represent any other successful strategies and ideas that are taking place as we speak.

Our success with Mazda as the exclusive web provider has produced very custom websites for the dealer, while still maintaining the brand equity Mazda requires. Dealers have been extremely happy and dealers that don’t want to participate, don’t have to. Novel.

This was a perfect example of how the OEM HAS taken the dealers life into account when developing their web strategy; A very hot point for the dealers on stage with good reason. This would have made the discussion so much more relevant and accurate

Moreover, Dealer.com and Dealerskins are 2 of 4 preferred web developers for Nissan. Nissan’s philosophy is to give dealers a choice of four companies that have proven they can build compliant websites, and also offer national incentive and sales event updates across multiple vendors. A CRUCIAL point that would have completely changed the course of that conversation and encouraged dealers that there CAN be a positive OEM/Dealer website initiative that can please everyone…a point that would have been FAR better to end that discussion on.

Being a much larger data set, and a far better web strategy, why was Nissan not the panelist??? Because they use more than just Dealer.com for their strategy? Of course, this would have blown Dealer.com’s sales pitch of only using one provider to have the best solution. It’s not true.

Frankly, the Subaru web initiative is one of the smallest (with only about 100 dealers participating) and has statistically NOT been one of the more successful. (We have multi-line dealers with Nissan, Mazda and Subaru and their Subaru site ironically performs the worst!)

It should Never have been the ONLY example of OEM website strategies on that panel. Mainly because Dealer.com has other OEM relationships that are NOT exclusive that would have made far better examples.

There should never have been ALL clients of the moderator’s company on that panel. That defeats the whole purpose of these panels and destroys the opportunity to give the listeners the most accurate, most intelligent, most diverse, and most comprehensive information available. Instead they left with the understanding the Dealer.com is the only company that has this “website thing” figured out.

In the years past, Kevin Root from Cobalt and I were that same panel to give at least two opinions from the web builder’s side. It was much more valuable and informative to listeners. This year NO other web developers were given a chance to represent their successful strategies with much larger and more successful OEMs. I’m just extremely disappointed and frankly offended that this was allowed to occur.

You do not realize how competitive and difficult the web dev space is.

In the wake of the current economic disaster in our industry, NO company can afford to have their main competitor handed such a falsly acredited competitive advantage of this magnitude.

The worst part ultimately…the dealers were not given the proper information in which to make important business decisions for their livelihoods and THAT should be the only reason why any of us are in this business…the dealers pay all of us….they deserve accurate, non biased, multi-channeled, verifiable, statistically valid information.

A couple of quick points,not to defend, but explain:
- There was ground breaking info in our opening presentation. Watch that video
- Yes,we needed more dealers. We tried. Based on dealer feedback from last year, we elminated the dealer-track breakouts. They told us they wanted to be with the OEMs.

Would like to hear more thoughts on how to improve the conference:

Gene Cameron
gene.cameron@jdpa.com

That was a big portion of Farley’s presentation – The Fiesta campaign was a massive undertaking.

I followed several of the participants on twitter…brilliant campaign as it created a massive folloing of people who wanted to become drivers and those who simply want to see the drivers’ exploits.

I remember someone asking at JD Power if these participants’ experiences were genuine? I can’t see how they couldn’t have been more genuine.

Drivers we tasked with specific activities on top of their daily usage…the reactions I saw seemed to nothing but genuine.

Simple premise: Let the consumer customize their experience.

I saw a bunch of videos, but one had a couple of FORD guys talking about the results they’re getting from a campaign where they gave some FIESTAS to I think a 100? or so people so they could demo it and blog about it with no restrictions. Apparently they’ve had a huge response.

Did you hear any mention of that at JD?

Here are some results from oct 2nd,
- 4.3 million YouTube (YouTube) views thus far
- 500,000+ Flickr (Flickr) views
- 3 million+ Twitter impression
- 50,000 interested potential customers, 97% of which don’t own a Ford currently.

http://fiestamovement.com/

From my own personal experiences I have seen where moving forward is fixing the core. Somehow, installing the furniture before the concrete slab is laid is actually improving the quality of the concrete!

This is a recent realization for me, but the more I think about it the more I’m realizing it is the truth. There is one key point I didn’t make in that article, and that is I monitor what our employees are doing across a wide breadth of mediums. Without doing that I could never connect these dots and help people recognize the areas they’re doing well in for the benefit of the areas they’re struggling in.

Kevin – I’m glad you pointed out Google Caffeine. Jeff or I need to write about that one. I’ve been doing a lot of comparisons on http://www.comparecaffeine.com and am finding some holes in our current strategy if this truly is the future of organic Google search results.