<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cobalt Group buys Onstation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dealerrefresh.com/the-cobalt-group-buys-onstation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dealerrefresh.com/the-cobalt-group-buys-onstation/</link>
	<description>Obstacles, Observations and Opinions of an Automotive Internet Sales Manager</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autodealer</title>
		<link>http://www.dealerrefresh.com/the-cobalt-group-buys-onstation/comment-page-1/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>Autodealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealerrefresh.groovecommerce.com/?p=78#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>I actually signed the program on at our dealership and it is rather primitive on its email content, this is for the have to sacrifice many things to assure the high deliverability rates and an automated product. The product, like all of Cobalt service could really use some serious overhauls before it becomes a mainstream dominant product. It is too labor intensive and lacks a lot of sizzle.

It is more of a service tailored product, with some spillover to sales.

The plus of this product is that GM is in bed with Cobalt and reimburses its dealers some of the cost.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually signed the program on at our dealership and it is rather primitive on its email content, this is for the have to sacrifice many things to assure the high deliverability rates and an automated product. The product, like all of Cobalt service could really use some serious overhauls before it becomes a mainstream dominant product. It is too labor intensive and lacks a lot of sizzle.</p>
<p>It is more of a service tailored product, with some spillover to sales.</p>
<p>The plus of this product is that GM is in bed with Cobalt and reimburses its dealers some of the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Gerardi</title>
		<link>http://www.dealerrefresh.com/the-cobalt-group-buys-onstation/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Gerardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 06:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dealerrefresh.groovecommerce.com/?p=78#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Not familiar with OnStation but based on what you say about their program, I can see why Cobalt is interested. This is a great money-maker and with IntegraLink Cobalt can probably increase their profit margins to where OnStation can not. Do you know if Cobalt has been outsourcing this part of their product to OnStation?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not familiar with OnStation but based on what you say about their program, I can see why Cobalt is interested. This is a great money-maker and with IntegraLink Cobalt can probably increase their profit margins to where OnStation can not. Do you know if Cobalt has been outsourcing this part of their product to OnStation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

